Ufa
Humanitarian
Journal

The article analyzes publication indicators of disciplines in the social sciences and humanities in diff erent citation databases. Signifi cant limitations in the eff ectiveness of international databases with a sharp predominance of English-language journals are established. Substantial limitations of The Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) with a predominance of Russian-language content of all types including not only scientifi c publications is stated. Comparison of the results of diff erent citation databases along with similarities revealed signifi cant diff erences. In all cases, the fi rst positions on the impact factor and Hirsch indices belong to the natural sciences. The least cited branches were mainly applied sciences represented by a small number of specialists. Calculation of the indicators of the fi rst ten most cited authors of the RSCI for each section (number of articles, citations and H-index) revealed that most social sciences and humanities disciplines gravitate toward the second and third quarters of the rating list. The universal factors of the relatively small number of citations of humanities scholars are the following: small number of specialists, preference for individual work, a monographic format for presenting the main results, a longer publication life cycle, fragmentation of the subject matter, etc. There are also such specifi c factors in Russia as language barrier, poor command of modern discourse, a small number of high-quality domestic journals with a translated version, citation culture, etc. An analysis of the format and subject matter of the most cited authors in the Historical Sciences category showed that fundamental theoretical works, large monographic generalizations and the results of multidisciplinary research mostly typical for archeology are in-demand. This discipline due to the specifi cs of obtaining information and the need to verify conclusions is closely integrated into the system of connections with natural and other sciences not only in terms of methods, but also in elements of the research procedure. Thus, the use of unifi ed bibliometric effi  ciency tools leads to erroneous conclusions regarding individual sciences let alone a specifi c scientist provoking social tension within the scientifi c community. Expert assessment should be based on other criteria in which digital data play a supporting role.

bibliometrics, social and human sciences, citation indicators, bibliometric databases

• Akoev, M.A., Markusova, V.A., Moskaleva O.V., Pislyakov V.V. 2021, Guide to scientometry: indicators of the development of science and technology, 2nd ed., CPI UrFU, Yekaterinburg, 358 p. (In Russ.)
• Dadalko, V.A., Dadalko, S.V. 2020, “Scientometrics in the context of science and modern education”, Academic Council, no. 1, pp. 14–25. (In Russ.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2020.1.13
• Elizarov, A. “Scientometry and bibliometry”: why measure the effectiveness of scientific work and how it is done in 2020. URL: https://lala.lanbook.com/naukometriya-i-bibliometriya-zachem-izmeryat-rezultativnost-nauchnogo-truda?ysclid=m00vjregy4178088606 (дата обращения: 19.08.2024) (In Russ.)
• Epimakhov, A.V. 2021, “Multidisciplinary archaeological research in the study of migration and mobility (the Bronze Age of the Southern Urals)”, Problems of history, philology, culture, no. 3 (73), pp. 5-17. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18503/1992-0431-2021-3-73-5–17 
• Grinev, A.V. 2023, “The problem of scientometric discrimination of Russian humanities”, Sociology of science and technology, vol. 14, no. 2122, pp. 122–143. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2079-0910-2023-2-122-143 
• Indicators of science: statistical collection. Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2021, 352 p. (In Russ.)
• Klein, L.S. 2001, Principles of archaeology. Belvedere, St. Petersburg, 152 p. (In Russ.)
• Kristiansen, K. 2022, “Archaeology and the Genetic Revolution in European Prehistory”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 100 p. (In Eng.)
• Malakhov, V.A. 2022, “Bibliometric analysis as a method of scientific research: opportunities and limitations”, Scientific research, no. 1, pp. 212–227. (In Russ.)
• Moskaleva, O.V., Akoev, M.A. 2019, “Scientometrics: a little history and modern Russian realities”, Management of science: theory and practice, no. 1, pp. 135-148. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2019.1.1.5 
• Polyanin, A.D. 2014, “Disadvantages of the citation and Hirsch indices. Maximum citation indexes”, The world of mathematical equations. URL: https://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/ru/info/sci-edu/Polyanin_IndexH_2014.html (дата обращения: 19.08.2024) (In Russ.)