Ufa
humanitarian
journal

In this article, we will look at various versions of the origin of the hydronym Rawat (Rus. Revet’). We will analyze its lexico-semantic and etymological features, as well as consider its phonetic appearance and possible associations that it evokes. There are many hypotheses about the origin of the hydronym Rawat, based on various languages such as Turkic (Bashkir), Semitic (Arabic), Finno-Ugric and Iranian. In this article, we will look at these versions and analyze them. We will also consider the phonomorphological variants of the hydronym in Russian, such as Reut, Reft, Revt and Revda, and try to critically evaluate the existing etymologies. At the end of the article, we will offer our point of view on the origin of the river's name. This name is based on the objective geographical and landscape characteristics of the reservoir, as well as the broad socio-cultural context of the use of the appellative "reut" in Eurasian toponymy. A comparison of the hydronym "reut" with other names containing the root "reut", "reft", "rev" or "revda" shows that these roots have a common origin and have undergone phonetic and morphological changes in accordance with the rules of the Russian language. The analysis shows that the name "Raut" is of Iranian origin and is a substrate in Bashkir hydronymy. It comes from the word "rauda", which means "copper". This name reflects the history of the region's settlement, as well as the contacts and interaction of the Iranian, Finno-Ugric and Turkic peoples (Bashkirs), their languages and cultures. The study of the semantics of the appellative, from which the hydronym "Reut" is derived, helps to preserve and transfer knowledge about it as part of the cultural heritage of Bashkortostan.

onomastics, toponymy, hydronymy of Bashkortostan, etymology, Iranian substratum, the Bashkir language

Academic Dictionary of the Bashkir Language, vol. VI, 2014, ed. F.G. Khisamitdinova, Kitap, Ufa, 944 p. (In Bash., Russ.)

Belitskaya, A.A., 2014, “On the role of hesitation pauses in spontaneous speech”, Philology and Literature. Electronic scientific and practical journal, no. 2. URL: http://philology.snauka.ru/2014/02/697 (аccessed: 11.10.2024). (In Russ.)

Bogdanova-Beglaryan, N.V., 2014, “Pragmatic items in everyday speech: definition of the concept and general typology”, Perm University Herald, no. 3(27), pp. 7–20. (In Russ.)

Bogdanova-Beglaryan, N.V., 2015, “Verbal hesitatives of Russian oral speech: implementation of the search function and the ‘search reflex”, Language and Method. Research on the Russian Language in the 21^st Century. Conference Proceedings, Jagiellonian University Press, Krakow, pp. 345–354. (In Russ.)

Buskunbaeva, L.A., 2019, “Hezitational pause as a metacommunication marker in the Bashkir language (based on the dialectal corpus of the Bashkir language)”, The Second International Nevruz Summit. Proceedings, Iksad Yayinevi, Antalya, pp. 70–74. (In Russ.)

Buskunbaeva, L.A., 2024, “Verbal hesitatives in spontaneous Bashkir speech (based on dialect discourses)”, Russian Turkology, no. 1–2 (42–43), pр. 30–41. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi. org/10.37892/2712-8121-2024-42-43-30-41

Buskunbaeva, L.A., Rahmatullina, Z.Ya., Yagafarova, G.N., 2023, “Features of the functioning of discursive marker nu in Bashkir monologue speech”, New Research of Tuva, no. 2, pp. 166–178. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2023.2.12

Verkhodanova, V.O., Karpov, A.A., 2012, “Speech disfluencies modelling in automatic speech recognition systems”, Tomsk State University Journal, no. 363, pp. 10–15. (In Russ.)

Zaynullina, G.D., 2002, Russian-Bashkir Dictionary of Linguistic Terms. BGU, Ufa, 280 p. (In Russ., Bash.)

Cardwell, M., 2000, The Dictionary of Psychology. FAIR-PRESS, Moscow, 448 p. (In Russ.)

Laurinavichyute, A.K., Fedorova, O.V., 2010, “Effects of hesitation in speech on syntactic structure in comprehension: evidence from Russian speakers”, Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Technologies. Dialogue. Conference Proceedings, iss. 9 (16), RGGU, Moscow, pp. 279–284. (In Russ.)

Plungyan, V.A., 2014, “Nu is one of the oldest Indo-European words”, Postnauka. URL: https://postnauka. ru/talks/27774 (accessed: Mart 03, 2025). (In Russ.)

Podlesskaya, V.I., 2013, “Syntax and prosody of self-repairs: a corpus approach”, Proceedings of the international conference “Corpus linguistics – 2013, Izd-vo SpbGU, St.-Petersburg, pp. 396–404. (In Russ.)

Podlesskaya, V.I., 2014, “They shot him dead, oh, no, they knifed him dead with a saber’: self-repairs in oral stories”, Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue”. Iss. 13 (20), Izd-vo RGGU, Moscow, pp. 526–540. (In Russ.)

Podlesskaya, V.I., Kibrik, A.A., 2005, “Correction of failures in oral spontaneous speech: experience of corpus research”, Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference Dialog’2005, Nauka, Moscow. URL: http://www.dialog-21.ru/media/2416/ podlesskaya-kibrik. pdf (accessed: 16.10.2024). (In Russ.)

Podlesskaya, V.I., Kibrik, A.A., 2007, “Self-repairs and other speech failures as data annotation objects in oral corpuses”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, vol. 2, no. 23, pp. 2–23. (In Russ.)

Podlesskaya, V.I., Khurshudyan, V.G., 2006, “Hesitation markers in spontaneous discourse: some evidence from Armenian”, Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Technologies. Dialogue 2006. Conference Proceedings, Izd-vo RGGU, Moscow, pp. 429–440. (In Russ.)

Rozental, D.E., Telenkova, M.A., 1976, The Reference Dictionary of Linguistic Terms. Prosveshchenie, Moscow, 543 p. (In Russ.)

Russian Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Humanities, vol. 2, 2002. VLADOS, Moscow, St.-Petersburg. URL: http://niv.ru/doc/dictionary/russian-humanitarian/index.htm (accessed: 18.11.2024). (In Russ.)

Fakova, R.A., Perepelitsina, Yu.R., 2015, “Filler words in modern Russian”, The Eurasian Scientific Journal, no. 12, pp. 651–654. (In Russ.)

Goldman-Eisler, F., 1967, “Sequential temporal patterns and cognitive processes in speech”, Language and Speech, vol. l, pp. 122–132. (In Eng.)

Levontina, I., Shmelev, A., 2007, “False emptiness: Are so called ‘parasitical words’ really semantically void?”, Meaning – Text Theory 2007: Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 69, München, Wien. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/ author/I.-Levontina/65991029 (accessed: 20.10.2024).