Ufa
Humanitarian
Journal

This article examines an innovative functional-semantic model for classifying grammatical categories in the English language, specifically adapted for Russian-speaking learners. Traditional systems of English grammar, developed primarily for the purposes of descriptive linguistics, often rely on formal systematics, which creates significant cognitive overload and terminological confusion for foreign learners. For example, the conventional division of verbs into main verbs, auxiliary verbs, modal verbs and linking verbs lacks logical transparency when viewed through the lens of Russian grammatical intuition. Furthermore, the traditional interpretation of participle forms (Participle 1 and Participle 2) as impersonal verb forms often blurs the line between modifiers, gerunds, and predicate components, thereby hindering the development of solid grammatical skills. To address these dedactic challenges, this study proposes a simplified binary classification of verbs, distinguishing only between auxiliary verbs (functional operators responsible for forming questions, negations, tense, and modality) and main verbs (carriers of key lexical meaning or state). By neutralizing artificial boundaries between modal and auxiliary verbs, as well as between semantic and linking verbs, the proposed structure allows for the formulation of universal and easily predictable syntactic rules for all tenses. Furthermore, the model justifies the need to reinterpret Participle 1 and Participle 2 as independent parts of speech–active and passive participles, respectively–thereby aligning English grammatical concepts with familiar Russian morphological categories. This functional division allows students to mechanically construct complex tense-aspect and voice forms, transforming abstract formulas into a logical semantic constructor. A comparative analysis highlights how this adapted nomenclature effectively minimizes cross-linguistic interference and promotes deeper cognitive assimilation of the material. Ultimately, this theoretical and methodological restructuring shifts the focus from the rote memorization of exceptions to a conscious understanding of structural logic. The proposed model provides a solid foundation for future applied research, the development of textbooks, and pedagogical experiments in the field of teaching English as a foreign language.

English grammar, language pedagogy, the functional-semantic approach, cognitive linguistics, cross-linguistic interference, participles, auxiliary verbs

• Alimov, V.V., 2005. Interference in translation. KomKniga, Moscow, 232 p. (In Russ.).
• Blokh, M.Ya., 2000. Theoretical grammar of the English language. Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, 381 p. (In Russ.).
• Gak, V.G., 1989. Comparative typology of French and Russian languages. Prosveshcheniye, Moscow, 288 p. (In Russ.).
• Zimnyaya, I.A., 1991. Psychology of teaching foreign languages at school. Prosveshcheniye, Moscow, 222 p. (In Russ.).
• Zubko, D.D., Miribyan, E.R., 2025. Grammatical changes in the English language. URL: https://modsc.ru/archive/grammaticheskie-izmeneniya-v-angliyskom/ (accessed: 18.09.2025). (In Russ.).
• Plotkin, V.Ya., 1989. The structure of the English language. Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, 239 p. (In Russ.).
• Smirnitskiy, A.I., 1959. Morphology of the English language. Izdatel'stvo Literatury na Inostrannykh Yazykakh, Moscow, 440 p. (In Russ.).
• Ter-Minasova, S.G., 2000. Language and intercultural communication. Slovo, Moscow, 624 p. (In Russ.).
• Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, 251 p. (In Eng.).
• Gass, S.M., Selinker, L., 2008. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. Routledge, New York, 594 p. (In Eng.).
• Goldberg, A.E., 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 280 p. (In Eng.).
• Halliday, M.A.K., 2014. Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge, London, 808 p. (In Eng.).
• Jespersen, O., 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. George Allen & Unwin, London, 359 p. (In Eng.).
• Langacker, R.W., 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 562 p. (In Eng.).
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G.N., Svartvik, J., 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London, 1779 p. (In Eng.).
• Swan, M., 2016. Practical English Usage. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 656 p. (In Eng.).