Ufa
Humanitarian
Journal

The article examines the important role of traditional wedding ceremonies of the peoples of Russia in the process of transferring spiritual and moral values and socializing new generations. The purpose of the study is to identify the common value and semantic foundation of the wedding ceremony, which unites different ethnocultural, territorial and religious groups. The work uses ethnographic sources of the 19^th–21^st centuries, diary entries, scientific literature, as well as personal observations of the author, which allowed us to record the modern marriage traditions of Russians, Tatars, Yakuts, Ossetians and Buryats. The article considers the family as the most important social institution that ensures the continuity of social experience and cultural identity. The rituals and symbols that reinforce ideas about family responsibilities, respect for elders and responsibility for procreation throughout the entire process of preparing for the wedding, the wedding itself and the first years of living together are analyzed. In the main part of the work, we analyze in detail the ethnic and cultural diversity of wedding traditions of different peoples of Russia. The article discusses pre-wedding customs, courtship culture, screenings, matchmaking, buyout for a bride and other stages of the marriage ceremony. We also pay attention to the economic and calendar features that were typical for the wedding season. In addition to Russian traditions, the work examines in detail the features of Tatar, Yakut, Ossetian and Buryat weddings. We notice how Orthodox, Islamic, and Buddhist religious canons are intertwined with ancient folk beliefs, shamanism, and animism. The article explores such important ceremonial elements as the preparation of ritual dishes and drinks, familiarization with the hearth and water sources, as well as the sacred functions of festive costumes and headdresses. In the final part of the work, we reflect on how ancient customs have transformed and adapted to modern wedding culture. For example, we consider meeting with a loaf, showering with coins and hanging up locks. The work draws attention to the importance of both the external, decorative use of national elements and a deep understanding of their inner value meaning. This is of key importance for strengthening the institution of the modern family. The preservation of national identity in the face of modern socio-cultural challenges is becoming a support and protection for the younger generation, which often faces conflicting values. The research on wedding traditions has great practical significance, as it emphasizes the value of marriage, the importance of intergenerational ties and suggests rethinking the issue of preserving the cultural traditions of the peoples of Russia.

traditional values, wedding rites, family upbringing, ethnocultural traditions, continuity, social roles, national identity, institutions of socialization

• Berdinskikh, V.A., 1994, Russia and the Russians (Peasant civilization in the memoirs of eyewitnesses), Vyatka State University, Kirov, 287 p. (In Russ.)
• Daueva, T.T., 2024, Ossetian Wedding Observances: Unity of the Traditional and the New, Klio, no. 12 (216), pp. 83–87. https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-9773-2024-12216-83-87 (In Russ.)
• Zelenin, D.K., 2013, Russian ethnography. Ed. by K.V. Chistov, Institut russkoj civilizacii, Moscow, 672 p. (In Russ.)
• Ivakhinova, Ya.Ts., 2014, Traditions of the Buryat wedding: Teacher's notes, Buryaad-mongol nom, Ulan-Ude, 107 p. (In Buryat and Russ.)
• Kaloev, B.A., 1971, Ossetians (Historical and ethnographic research), 2nd ed., corrected and enlarged, Nauka, Moscow, 247 p. (In Russ.)
• Likhtarnikov, A.L., 2006, Conditions of values transfer in childrens family upbringing, Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, vol. 7, no. 17, pp. 78–89. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15112549&ysclid=msmwbffql5604305658 (accessed: 15.06.2026) (In Russ.)
• Loktionova, N.M., Kuzminova, I.A., 2016, Women's headwear in the context of the national costume, The Humanities and Social sciences, no. 5, pp. 109–115. https://doi.org/10.18522/2070-1403-2016-58-5-109-116 (In Russ.)
• Maximova, M.I., 2020, Traditional wedding ceremonies of the Yakuts in Modern Times, Word science: problems and innovations: collection of papers of 43^rd International Scientific and Practical Conference, MCNS «Nauka i Prosveshchenie», Penza, pp. 291–294. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42906338&ysclid=msn0kd0x6m372101862 (accessed: 15.06.2026) (In Russ.)
• Mekhrishvili, L.L., Tkacheva, N.A., Yudashkin, V.A., 2024, Formation and Transmission of Traditional Values in a Modern Multigenerational Family in Russia, DEMIS. Demographic Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 6–23. (In Russ.)
• Plesovskiy, F.V., 1968, Komi peoples wedding. Rites and lamentations, Komi knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 320 p. (In Russ.) URL: https://psv4.vkuserphoto.ru/s/v1/d/3-5JWRFB31Lvi2nOXBYvZVqEkvuEQ3T1ubEAYHC3CKpU-bV7DtXHTZ_bnvgbF4iOgCBzWLBjGLz1wvwzybJIgA8FEtYSymRlFRazrlALMdICi0tX2A_7eA/svadba_naroda_komi.pdf (accessed: 15.06.2026)
• Seroshevsky, V.L., 1993, Yakuts. Experience of ethnographic research. 2nd ed. Moscow, 736 p. (In Russ.)
• Tutaev, R.G., 2016, Customs of the Ossetians, Respekt, Vladikavkaz, 352 p. (In Russ.)
• Khanipova, I.I., 2024, Visual sources about new Soviet rituals in a Tatar village in the 1970s, Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical Ethnology], vol. 9. no. 2, pp. 184–200. https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2024-9-2.184-200 (In Russ.)
• Chochiev, G.V., 2023, Everyday Life and Historical Memory of the Inhabitants of the Ossetian Villages of the Sarıkamış District according to the Diaries of Süleyman Kazmaz, 1940–1941, Bulletin of the Vladikavkaz Scientific Center, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 36–48. https://doi.org/10.46698/VNC.2023.96.86.001 (In Russ.)
• Yakovleva, E.L., 2023, National festive culture as a way of preserving national identity, Greater Eurasia: Development, security, cooperation. Proceedings of the 5^th Int. Scientific-Practical. Conf., Annual book, iss. 6, part 1, ed. V.I. Gerasimov, RAS. INION. Dept. of scientific cooperation, Moscow, pp. 693–695. (In Russ.)